Now, I will say that I could answer these questions in
high school – although that is only because I avidly read through whatever
history textbooks we got, so much so that I usually finished reading them
sometime in the second month of the school year. I love learning about history;
that’s the only reason I could answer the questions. To expect the entire
student body to meet these standards, however, is absolutely ridiculous. Personally,
I don’t think students could explain these things until they got into college,
and most of the history classes I’ve had in college wouldn’t tackle these subjects
until they got into the late 200 level.
Schools also have the inverse problem: while many traditionally-taught
books are being removed from classrooms, those books which remain are taught to
death. As Gallagher puts it, schools chop books up, add worksheets every few
minutes during cooking, overcook all the flavor from the book, and serve in
bite-sized chunks (never as a full meal, only as a snack). All this says to our
students is that we don’t believe in them. We don’t trust them enough to get
through a book all on their own and develop their own ideas and opinions on it;
no, we must make sure they fully understand it and that no little tidbit is
missed. Yes, the student now “knows” whatever book they are reading, but they
despise it afterward. What modern America has developed is a sure-fire recipe
for ensuring students can pass any test on whatever book we assign them, but
ultimately are worse readers for it and lose out on any critical thinking
skills they may have developed from reading and understanding the text
themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment